April 26, 2020. Madison, Mississippi. A True Story.

Years ago, the accountant at the association accused the director of sexual advances. It was her word against his. On the advice of the attorney, he was fired. Two years later, the treasure of the organization asked for the back three years of the records. The same lady accountant accused the treasure of making sexual advances to her. But this time the treasurer was smart. She always spoke to the accountant in the open office where other folks were present. So when questioning the other staff they discovered the story was made up and the accountant was fired. So I know from personal experiences, that not all ladies tell the truth. So I am puzzled. During the hearing for the last SupremeCourt Justice, on a facebook of a friend, said a saying that meant the lady told the truth. Many years ago, a lady accused the candidate of sexual advances. This comment stayed on Facebook way after the gentleman was already on the Supreme Court. In other words, when a lady makes accusations, she must be believed. Now a lady has accused the former Vice President of making sexual advances long ago in 1983. I am looking for the same comment about this lady now. If my friend thought the first lady was believable, how about the new one. I being a cynic , would always await for an investigation. The wicked lady in my true story eventually admitted that both stories were lies. In the first incident she wanted the job. In the second she knew she did not want anyone looking at the books. But why the difference? I am awaiting to see the sign on the Facebook page that says the lady was telling the truth. I am waiting.